Imagine a compliance platform that costs you $12,000 per year. Does that sound pricey?
What it replaces will determine the answer.
Automating the gathering of evidence across a complex technology environment eliminates hundreds hours of repetitive work, then $12,000 could be a wise investment. If a company of seven could gather the same data manually in a few minutes every month, the cost appears to be quite different.
It’s a smart method of looking for the Vanta alternative. Identifying the platform with the greatest features is not the only thing to consider. Determine how many hours and time these features could save your business.
Automated Manufacturing Comes with an End-of-Even
Automating compliance isn’t inherently beneficial or harmful. The value of compliance automation will change as the company expands. Imagine a company that is growing with multiple cloud environments and many applications. Manually collecting evidence could be a huge operational burden. Integrations that automatically monitor systems and record evidence easily justify the expense.
Think about a company with 10 employees who are preparing for their first SOC 2. The system may be compact, and evidence collection may be manageable without the need for extensive automation.
Vanta pricing is based on this difference. The capabilities of a modern platform are amazing, but they can only be of value when an organization needs them.
Compare Architecture with Brands, not just Brands
A search for Vanta vs Drata can quickly become a feature-by-feature exercise. Both are trusted solutions for compliance based on automation and integrations, so looking at their supported frameworks including integrations, service contracts, and individual quotes could prove useful to companies looking to implement this approach.
Another decision needs to be made before that. Do you want a compliance platform that integrates? Some companies want continuous monitoring and automated collection of evidence. Some businesses prefer to collect evidence on their own, especially if the workload remains modest.
Vanta Competitors Don’t All Follow the Same Model
Several well-known Vanta rivals have a place in the market, with the same focus on automation. There are other platforms focused on organization with the vast system connectivity.
CertAssist belongs to the latter category. CertAssist was created by internal auditors, compliance consultants, and other professionals, organizes the controls frameworks into a single workspace. It offers editable guidelines and policies for evidence and allows auditors to examine evidence with read-only access.
It does not set up agents or connect to the infrastructure system. Customers can upload their own evidence if they want to use.
Be aware of the system access.
The removal of integrations comes with a clear drawback: you have to gather evidence by hand.
This is a way to eliminate the need for integration, and the use of compliance is not dependent on a connection to the operational environment.
Both are equally effective. It is essential to inquire what tradeoffs are appropriate for your particular business.
CertAssist is targeted towards teams of five to 200 employees and gives pricing information rather than having to have the sales pitch. The initial price listed for CertAssist is $225 monthly in comparison to the standard $375.
Let Complexity Find Its Place
The requirements for a start-up that a 10 person company has today may differ at 100 or even 500 employees.
While compliance is simple A lightweight platform could make sense. As the amount of systems, employees, frameworks and evidence requirements increase, the economy could ultimately favor more automation. It is better to let the complex technology of compliance earn its rightful place.
Spending money on fifty integrations just because they look good in a table of comparisons isn’t worth the cost. They should be paid for only if they are necessary and the cost for doing the task manually is higher.
