Let’s say a compliance platform is worth $12,000 per year. Is that expensive?
The replacement it makes will determine the final answer.
If automation eliminates hundreds of hours repetitive evidence gathering in a complex technology system, $12,000 might be well-spent. If a small business with seven employees could collect the same evidence in only a few hours each month, the cost differs.
That’s a useful way to approach the search for a Vanta alternative. Start by asking what platform comes with the most features. Find out how your company’s tools can help you save time and money.
Automation is an economic break-even The Key
Automating compliance isn’t necessarily good or bad. The importance of automation for compliance changes as the company grows. Imagine a rapidly growing tech company that has hundreds of employees many cloud environments, many applications, and frequently access modifications. Manually collecting evidence could become a serious operational burden. Integrations that automate monitoring systems and gather evidence can easily justify their costs.
Now consider a 10-person startup getting ready for its first SOC 2. Its infrastructure might be compact, and evidence collection might be manageable with extensive automation.
It is important to know the difference when you are evaluating Vanta pricing. While an advanced platform could have many features However, they’re only beneficial for organizations that are required by the company.
Compare Architecture and not just Brands
Vanta vs Drata is a discussion that can easily become a feature-by-feature exercise. It is crucial to evaluate the services, features contract and quotes offered by both platforms. Both are established compliance platforms that concentrate on automation and integrations.
It’s important to choose the other thing first. Do you need a system for compliance that is integrated? Certain businesses would prefer continuous monitoring or automated evidence collection and automated evidence gathering. Some businesses prefer to produce evidence on their own, particularly when workload is modest.
Vanta Competitors Don’t Follow the Same Model
Many well-known Vanta competitors compete within an identical category that is focused on automation. The market also includes lighter platforms designed around management rather than comprehensive system connectivity.
CertAssist is a part of the latter category. Created by compliance consultants and internal auditors, CertAssist organizes framework controls within a single workspace. It provides editable policy as well as evidence-based guidance. It also lets auditors review submitted evidence via access to only read-only.
It is not able to connect to operating systems or install infrastructure agents. Customers choose and upload the proof they wish to present.
Consideration of System Access in the Decision
The removal of integrations does not come without its downsides. Someone has to manually gather evidence.
This eliminates the need for integration, and the use of compliance is not dependent upon an interface to the operating environment.
The structures of one are not superior to the other. The important question is which option is most appropriate for your company.
CertAssist aims at teams that comprise between five and 200 people and provides pricing information rather than having to have a sales conversation. The price for the initial launch is $225 monthly, which compares to the regular price of $375 a month.
Let Complexity earn its place
The requirements for a start-up that a 10 person company has today may not be the same when you have 100 or even 500 employees.
A lightweight platform can be beneficial while compliance stays simple. As the amount of employees, systems, frameworks and evidence requirements increases, economics may eventually favor more automation. Let complexity take its place when buying compliance technologies.
Affording fifty integrations because they look good in a table of comparisons is not worth it. They’re worth the cost as the work they replace is more expensive than performing them manually.
